🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive action to restrict social platforms access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Lawmakers, campaigners, and guardians are observing closely to see if this approach will become a template for the rest of the world.

European Movement

In Europe, a growing group of states are moving toward similar restrictions.

• The Danish government has stated a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM arguing that smartphones and networks are "taking away our children's innocence". The policy may be formalized soon.
• Norway is planning to implement a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to safeguard the young from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is working on a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media users. Officials have suggested that an Australian-model ban remains "a potential tools on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has asked the legislature to enact a proposal increasing the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has suggested a similar action, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The government in The Dutch government has recommended parents to restrict their youngsters from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has adopted a symbolic motion supporting a ban for under-16s except if a parent decides otherwise is provided. Even though it warns of the "addictive" nature of these platforms, the step does not create binding law.

"A clear age restriction is a solid foundation," stated one parliamentarian behind the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Stance

For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a potential ban, stating that "nothing is discarded" but maintaining any action must be "grounded in robust data".

Last year, interest built behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately weakened. Instead, the government vowed to investigate the topic.

Charities have expressed concerns. A prominent charity set up by the relatives of a girl who was lost after being exposed to harmful platform posts argues that a blanket age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could result in a "cliff edge" of harm when teens become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the tech sector to design tools that are appropriate and age appropriate for minors," commented a leading peer.

The United States: A Decentralized Landscape

Across America, legislation is largely happening at the regional government level due to country-wide gridlock.

• Utah demands adult approval for minors to use social media and limits overnight use.
• The state of Florida has signed a law prohibiting children under fourteen from accessing social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has approved a regulation limiting teenagers to one hour of social media access per day, with any further use dependent on a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed measures demanding guardian approval for teenagers to open social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and proposals from certain individuals to mimic this lead, a nationwide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

International Views

Apart from these regions, further nations are likewise taking action.

• The Malaysian government aims to ban social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the required age for Instagram to 16.

But, world organizations adopt a more measured position. A major UN agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "may even backfire". The organization notes that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that bans should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to improve child safeguards.

While this global discussion unfolds, the steps of this nation and others show that states globally are increasingly willing to wait for the industry to act voluntarily.